Aspire CCS Inside Staff only · M365 SSO
Aspire CCS · Visual identity & brand system

The Brand Hub.

Everything you need to make work that looks, sounds and feels like Aspire — logo, palette, typography, templates, voice, and our four IP frameworks. One source of truth.

Brand version 2026.1 Last update May 2026 Owner Lisa Corbridge Approver Kaspar Roos
Primary mark
Aspire CCS
Logo system — five approved lockups
Download full pack →
Aspire CCS
Primary stacked (canonical) SVG · PNG ↓
Aspire CCS
Compact SVG · PNG ↓
Aspire CCS
On black (native) SVG · PNG ↓
Aspire CCS
On Aspire navy SVG · PNG ↓
Clear space rules: Keep clear space equal to the height of the mark icon around all sides. Minimum size: 24px digital, 12mm print. Never recolour, rotate, or recompose the mark. For "Aspire Inside" intranet sub-brand use, see sub-brand guidance →
Colour system — canonical palette · click to copy hex
Full guidelines →
Primary palette
Click to copy
Navy
#202D63 · RGB 32 45 99
Primary brand colour · institutional voice · body text in print
Click to copy
Cyan
#199CD8 · RGB 25 156 216
Action colour · links · interactive states · accents
Click to copy
Amber
#FFD300 · RGB 255 211 0
Highlight colour · pinned items · key CTAs · sparingly
Secondary palette
Click to copy
Amber dark
#F7A200 · RGB 247 162 0
Hover state for amber · attention without alarm
Click to copy
Dark grey
#3E3C3B · RGB 62 60 59
Body copy · neutral text · long-form reading
Click to copy
Light blue
#E8F5FB · RGB 232 245 251
Background tints · cards · soft surfaces · pull-quotes
Usage proportion: Navy 60% · Cyan 25% · Amber 8% · neutrals as needed. Amber is highlight, not background — never large flat fields. Source of truth: Navigator sign-in page (canonical).
Typography — Word/print & digital
Type-scale ref →
H1 / Heading 1Aptos · 28pt · 600
#2C2C83
Independent intelligence for the CCM-to-CXM market.
Used in: Word documents · MTRs · SOWs · proposals · handbook section heads
H2 / Heading 2Aptos · 22pt · 600
#0077C1
Why our independence matters
Sub-section headings within Word docs and reports
BodyAptos · 11pt · 400
#3E3C3B
Aspire CCS exists to guide organisations through one of the most consequential transformations in enterprise technology — the shift from Customer Communications Management to Customer Experience Management. We do this by combining independent research and analyst expertise with scalable intelligence products and deep vertical knowledge.
Standard reading text across all Word output · 1.4 line height
Table headerAptos · 10pt · 600
#2C2C83 on white
Geography  ·  Pay date  ·  Currency  ·  Provider
Used in benefits schedules · contact directories · structured comparison tables
Word theme + digital pairing. Aptos is our Word/print body family — humanist, neutral, readable at length. Digital surfaces (intranet, Navigator, aspireintelligence.com) use Fraunces (display serif) paired with IBM Plex Sans (body) — both Google Fonts, both load on the SharePoint master page.
Tone of voice — how we sound
Full voice guide →
Independent
Call it as we see it — never for sale
Expert
Specialist depth, not generalist gloss
Collaborative
One global team thinking together
Direct
No hedging, no overclaiming
Curious
Fresh angles, challenged assumptions
✓ We say
UK insurers will need to consolidate their CCM stack by 2027 — or carry the cost of duplicated platforms.
The evidence points one way: customer experience leaders invest 2.3x more in journey orchestration than laggards.
We disagree with Gartner's positioning on this — and here's the data.
This vendor's strength is also its constraint.
✗ We don't say
Many insurers are exploring options that may potentially lead to consolidation, although timing varies.
Industry leaders tend to focus on customer experience initiatives.
It's complicated and there are many perspectives to consider.
This vendor is a leader in the space.
Analyst voice vs Aspire voice. Vendor analyst statements (Leaderboard profiles, MTR vendor sections) use third-person, neutral tone as a methodological standard. Aspire-as-firm content (thought leadership, blogs, marketing) uses first-person collective — "we" — and our point of view shows. Don't mix the two within a single piece.
Hex copied to clipboard